Regulators Propose Brokerage Firms Disclose Kickbacks from Mutual Fund Underwriters
by Nicholas J Guiliano on May 16th, 2011

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, recently filed a proposed rule change with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission to to adopt NASD Rule 2830 (Investment Company Securities or mutual fund shares) as FINRA Rule 2341 (Investment Company Securities) with certain important changes.

NASD Rule 2830 regulates brokerage firms’ activities in connection with the sale and distribution of securities of mutual funds or investment company shares and limits the sales charges members may receive. It prohibits directed brokerage arrangements, limits the payment and receipt of cash and non-cash compensation, sets conditions on discounts to dealers, and addresses other issues such as purchases and sales of mutual funds as principal.

Proposed FINRA Rule 2341 would revise the provisions of NASD Rule 2830 in four areas. First, Rule 2341 would require a member to make new disclosures to investors regarding its receipt of or its entering into an arrangement to receive, cash compensation. Second, Rule 2341 would make a minor change to the recordkeepingrequirements for non-cash compensation. Third, Rule 2341 would eliminate a condition regarding discounted sales of investment company securities to dealers. Fourth, Rule 2341 would codify past FINRA staff interpretations regarding the purchases and sales of exchange-traded funds ("ETFs").

In connection with the distribution and sale of investment company securities, NASD Rule 2830 limits the sales charges members may receive, prohibits directed brokerage arrangements, limits the payment and receipt of cash and non-cash compensation, sets conditions on discounts to dealers, and addresses other issues such as members’ purchases and sales of investment company securities as principal.

Proposed FINRA Rule 2341 would revise the provisions of NASD Rule 2830 in four areas. First, Rule 2341 would require a member to make new disclosures to investors regarding its receipt of or its entering into an arrangement to receive, cash compensation. Second, Rule 2341 would make a minor change to the record requirements for non-cash compensation. Third, Rule 2341 would eliminate a condition regarding discounted sales of investment company securities to dealers. Fourth, Rule 2341 would codify past FINRA staff interpretations regarding the purchases and sales of exchange-traded funds ("ETFs")

First, the member would have to prominently disclose that it has received, or has entered into an arrangement to receive, cash compensation from investment companies and their affiliates, in addition to the sales charges and service fees disclosed in the prospectus fee table. Second, the member would have to prominently disclose that this additional cash compensation may influence the selection of investment company securities that the member and its associated persons offer or recommend to investors. Third, the member would have to provide a prominent reference (or in the case of electronically delivered documents, a hyperlink) to a web page or toll-free telephone number where the investor could obtain additional information concerning these

arrangements.

Proposed Changes Regarding Sales of Shares of ETFs

In recent years, members have bought and sold shares of ETFs, which are openend management investment companies or unit investment trusts ("UITs") that differ from traditional mutual funds and UITs, since their shares typically are traded on securities exchanges. Because ETF shares are sometimes traded at prices that differ from the fund’s current net asset value, ETFs can raise issues under both the Investment Company Act and NASD Rule 2830.

For example, Section 22(d) of the Investment Company Act requires dealers to sell shares of an open-end investment company at the current public offering price described in the investment company’s prospectus (i.e., the fund’s net asset value plus any applicable sales load). Similarly, NASD Rule 2830(i) generally prohibits members from purchasing fund shares at a price lower than the bid price next quoted by or for the issuer (for traditional mutual funds, this price is the fund’s next quoted net asset value).

Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire, Guiliano Law Firm, P.C. Practice limited to the representation of investors in arbitration claims against stockbrokers for fraud, the sale of unsuitable investments, breach of fiduciary duty, failure to supervise. National Practice. Contingent Fee. Free Consultation. (877) SEC-ATTY

Also Consider:
Subscription
  
Recent Articles
Royal Alliance Associates Sues Ponzi Scheme Victims to Block Arbitrations; Attorneys for Victims Seek to Consolidate Cases
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, February 4, 2012 (Globe Newswire) –Royal Alliance Associates, an  AIG Advisor Group division owned by American International Group (NYSE: AIG), sued victims of a Ponzi scheme to block pending FINRA arbitration claims, where the victims have alleged that Royal Alliance Associates failed to supervise the sales agents who sold the fraudulent investments, says Sonn & Erez PLC, cocounsel for the victims...
FINRA Arbitration Panel Weighs Overconcentration In FNMA Preferred Suitability Case
On October 4, 2011, a FINRA Arbitration Panel sitting Portland, Oregon, in the matter of James D...
Brokers who failed to fess up about debts to the tax authorities are hit with fines and suspensions.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA does not take kindly to stockbrokers who fail to disclose tax liens, perhaps because such behavior can signal untrustworthiness, the last thing you want to see in a stockbroker...
Will Investment Advisors Ever Be Really Regulated?
The migration of stockbrokers into the advisory arena through the marketing of brokers as ¡®trusted advisers¡¯ and ¡®financial advisors¡¯ over the years has fueled confusion among investors as to the services provided by stockbrokers and investment advisers as well as the level of protection...
All May Not Be Lost for Ponzi Scheme Investors.
Welcome to the age of the Ponzi Scheme, the result of the non-regulation of "hedge funds...
Article Archive